Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Reed v. Cornealison et al
as 5:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
John Russell Reed
Defendant:
Amanda D. Cornealison, Kinzey Rea Carby and Micheal Bingum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Jerry Sanchez, Isaac Kwarteng, Bryan Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rea-Ponce v. USA
as 3:2018cv01155
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Hector Arturo Rea-Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rea v. Davis
as 6:2017cv00241
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ramiro Rea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Rowlett v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51161
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKEY REA ROWLETT
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Herndon v. Discount Tires et al
as 3:2016cv01615
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rea'Shaw Herndon
Defendant:
Discount Tires, Houston Police Department, Harris County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herndon v. Roanoke Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv01616
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rea'Shaw Herndon
Defendant:
Roanoke Police Department, Dallas Police Department and Dallas County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sides v. Fisher et al
as 6:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Sides
Defendant:
Stacy Fisher, Beryl Bailey, Kevin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowlett v. Stephens
as 5:2015cv00978
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Rickey Rea Rowlett
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rea-Herrera v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2010cv02639
Petitioner:
Miguel Rea-Herrera
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
