Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Gonzalez v. Richmond Police Department
as 4:2024cv02238
Plaintiff:
Uvalde Maverick Gonzalez
Defendant:
Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Sgt Williams, Sgt Taylor, Deputy Vela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Ganey et al
as 4:2023cv01883
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Sergeant Ganey, Sgt Nweke, Deputy Masters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Lopez et al
as 4:2023cv01843
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Officer Lopez, Deputy Wolf, Sergeant Betancourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond v. Warden Coibert
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Richmond
Defendant:
Warden Coibert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burke v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Bridgette Smith, Captain Tim Chesser, Major Jacob Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Donnie Richmond, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. University Medical Center et al
as 5:2020cv00217
Defendant:
University Medical Center, Medical Staff, Chief Executive Officer of University Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. USA
as 2:2016cv00188
Petitioner:
Tammy R Richmond
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Richmond v. USA
as 4:2016cv00736
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
