Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Odem v. Johnson
as 23-10884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jarvis O. Johnson, Mailroom Supervisor, French Robertson Unit, Stanley Baldwin, Head Chaplaincy, French Robertson Unit, Paige Rutledge, Admin IV and others
Wilburn v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00015
Defendant:
FNU Sadler, FNU Hamblin, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Sadler v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30402
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA SADLER
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Birdow v. Martin et al
as 1:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darryl W. Birdow
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Jimmy Webb, Adam W. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00045
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Michael Shawn Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sadler v. USA
as 6:2016cv00337
Petitioner:
Steven Morris Sadler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Carl David Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Brian Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadler v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv00060
Petitioner:
Michael Shawn Sadler
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hays v. Stephens
as 6:2015cv00076
Petitioner:
Timothy Sadler Hays
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sadler v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00639
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Petitioner:
Joshua Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
