Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Thornton v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Thornton
Defendant:
Tina Y Clinton, Joni White, Timothy Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kizzie et al
as 4:2023cv04479
Plaintiff:
James Clinton Johnson
Defendant:
Regina Kizzie, Jody Baker, Blake Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04506
Petitioner:
James Clinton Johnson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Bridges
as 9:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Derek Clinton Ward
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Bridges
as 9:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Derek Clinton Ward
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thornton v. Dallas County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01945
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Thornton
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Dallas Co Dist Attorneys Office and Tina Y Clinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ards v. Judge In the 183rd District Court Room et al
as 4:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Clinton Laru Ards
Defendant:
Judge In the 183rd District Court Room, Mayor Sylvester Turner, Paulette Derousselle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Bridges
as 9:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Derek Clinton Ward
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hair v. Bells et al
as 5:2023cv00144
Defendant:
Becky Bells, Becky Harper, Garza County and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Hair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haralson v. Thomas et al
as 3:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Walter Jeton Haralson
Defendant:
Tamera Sherneil Thomas, Andrew McGahey, Esq. Graham P. Carner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
