Cases 1 - 10 of 9,812
Kheop v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Michael Abdullah Kheop
Defendant:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ellis v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ellis
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sepulveda v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Sepulveda
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garcia-Salinas v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00574
Petitioner:
Mauricio Garcia-Salinas
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Benson v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ashley Benson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez-Lopez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Javier Hernandez-Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barraza-Urias v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barraza-Urias
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Ellis Earl Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
