Cases 1 - 10 of 12,678
Olageshin v. Bexar County Texas et al
as 5:2024cv01065
Defendant:
Bexar County Texas, Bexar County Adult Detention Center, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Temitope Olageshin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02361
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Notice of Removal of Criminal Prosecution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edwards, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00382
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Edwards, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. O'Connor
as 3:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Reed O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00153
Respondent:
B Williams
Petitioner:
Roger Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Cain et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Williams, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jacob Louis Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State Classification Committee TDCJ et al
as 4:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
Kenrick B. Williams
Defendant:
State Classification Committee TDCJ, C. Bellow, Michael Britt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Cooke County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00871
Respondent:
Cooke County Detention Center
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Curley v. Nixon et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Stephanie McKinney, Nathan Jhonson, Tanedda Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Curley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
