Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. L T C W et al
as 3:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
Louisiana Transitional Center for Women, Chris Stinson, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Louisiana Transitional Center for Women et al
as 3:2022cv06061
Plaintiff:
Shanell Lynn Thompson
Defendant:
Louisiana Transitional Center for Women, Chris Stinson and John Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Hunter et al
as 4:2021cv03598
Defendant:
Christina Dorough, Houston Area Women's Center, Kelly Elaine Slayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women et al
as 3:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
April George
Defendant:
Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women, Louisiana Department of Corrections, Jim Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Lopez et al
as 7:2020cv00146
Defendant:
NFN Goateld, 25 Married Women, NFN Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marquis Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Binika Hankton v. Frederick Boutte
as 18-30948
Petitioner - Appellant:
BINIKA L. HANKTON
Respondent - Appellee:
FREDERICK BOUTTE, Warden, Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women
Landry et al v. Rogers et al
as 3:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tasco Gilmore, Tiffany B Landry and Patricia Washington
Defendant:
Louisiana Correctional Institute for Women and Jim Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Amy Hebert v. James Rogers, Warden
as 17-30191
Petitioner - Appellant:
AMY HEBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Robyn Davis v. James Rogers, Warden
as 16-31136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBYN LITTLE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ROGERS, WARDEN, LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
