Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Brown v. Roberts et al
as 6:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Henry Brown
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Joseph R. Biden, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gonzales v. Wray
as 24-10122
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Director, FBI, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and William Burns, Director, CIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fitch v. Garland
as 24-40017
Plaintiff:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Official capacity as U.S. Attorney General, Christopher Wray, Official Capacity as Director of F.B.I., Michael Carvajal, Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Baumberger v. Hooper
as 2:2023cv01491
Petitioner:
Jon Wray Baumberger
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fitch v. USA
as 23-40131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lamont Fitch
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Christopher Wray and others
Clinton v. Wray et al
as 3:2022cv02301
Petitioner:
Sean Puchalow Clinton
Respondent:
Christopher Wray, Kimberly Chentle and Radm Studeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
