Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Johnson v. Wright et al
as 1:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Ron Cleon Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Stuart Wright, Roger Henson, Aaron Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wright et al
as 1:2022cv06037
Plaintiff:
Ron Johnson and Ron Cleon Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Stuart Wright, Roger Henson, Aaron Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Bowman et al
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Chico Nakia Curry
Defendant:
Jimmy O. Bowman, Vernon B. Mitchell, Jr., Janathan E Yancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancy v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2020cv04158
Plaintiff:
Carl Edmond Yancy
Defendant:
TDCJ Office Adjura, The State Of Texas and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogus v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00278
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, LeeAnn Spears-Hollis, Jimmy Bowman and others
Plaintiff:
Brett David Bogus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sigler v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center et al
as 1:2018cv01253
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Detention Center, Yancy Spillman and James Williams
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Sigler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Yancy, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-10191
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL YANCY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Yancy v. Davis
as 4:2017cv03593
Petitioner:
Carl Edmond Yancy
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Russell v. Yancy
as 6:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
David Allen Russell
Defendant:
Brad Yancy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Yancy, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10176
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL YANCY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
