Cases 71 - 80 of 150
Landry v. Priority 1 Air Rescue Operations, Arizona LP
as 2:2015cv06979
Plaintiff:
Andrew Landry
Defendant:
Priority 1 Air Rescue Operations, Arizona LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Singh et al v. Tejada et al
as 5:2015cv01040
Plaintiff:
Hermeregildo Almendarez and Varinder Singh
Defendant:
Andrew Tejada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez v. Maintenance Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03302
Plaintiff:
Edwin Sanchez
Defendant:
Maintenance Solutions, Inc. and Phillip Andrews
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Valenzuela v. Pioneer Energy Services Corp.
as 5:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
Cipriano Aguilera, Michael Banicki, Nathan Boag and others
Defendant:
Pioneer Energy Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kraft v. Adams et al
as 4:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
Dana Kraft
Defendant:
Andrew Adams, Micah Torres and FlexFrac Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Lawrence et al v. Inwell, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01714
Plaintiff:
Scott Lawrence and Andrew Lawrence
Defendant:
Inwell, Inc. and MWD Services (MGMT), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Barbosa v. AB Erosion Control, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv01573
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Reyes Barbosa
Defendant:
AB Erosion Control, LLC and Andrew S Bray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Womack v. Complex People Leasing, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00306
Plaintiff:
David Womack
Defendant:
Complex People Leasing, LLC, Southern Management Group, LLC, Southern Management Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pouncie et al v. Dlorah Inc
as 3:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
Erica Pouncie , Lindsey Gonzales and Nichole Andrews-Coddington
Defendant:
Dlorah Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Jones v. Cretic Energy Services, LLC
as 4:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor Jones
Defendant:
Cretic Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
