Cases 91 - 100 of 195
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01336
Plaintiff:
Geographic Location Innovations LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and UNtied Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Franklin et al v. Robinson et al
as 3:2016cv00844
Defendant:
Robinson, Sherri Robinson, United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin, Derrick A. Franklin and Double J. Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Christy v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv01846
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Christy
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company , United Parcel Service, Inc. and David Patrick Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pritchett v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2015cv03594
Plaintiff:
Nunzi Pritchett
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ned v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 2:2015cv02500
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc , Liberty Mutual Insurance Co and Clarence Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ned v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02500
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Clarence Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ned
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Manas et al v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 4:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
Michael Manas and Felicia Manas
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
