Cases 101 - 110 of 1,369
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Degollado et al v. City of Port Lavaca, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Degollado, Daniel Herrera, Faded Smoke Shop LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas, Collin Rangnow, Kyle Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
