Cases 111 - 120 of 10,820
Brown v. Lumpkin
as 24-20080
Petitioner:
Darrel Wayne Brown
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bonner v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-40119
Petitioner:
William Dexter White
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Johnson v. Collier
as 24-40148
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Placido Samaniego, Jr., Assistant Warden, Candice Flannel, Assistant Warden and others
Ellison v. Lumpkin
as 24-10054
Petitioner:
Jacob Douglas Ellison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Krieg v. Blake
as 24-40048
Plaintiff:
William Henry Krieg
Defendant:
James E. Blake, Chibuike M. Omwuka, Fernater J. Smith and others
Lizcano v. Lumpkin
as 24-10124
Petitioner:
Juan Lizcano
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Enriquez v. DHS Immigration
as 24-20035
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration Department, Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and others
Kaderli v. Lumpkin
as 24-40068
Petitioner:
Roland Kaderli, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Rader
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 24-20040
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
