Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01142
Petitioner:
Angeles Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez et al v. CSOS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Ramirez , Miguel Vega , Stephen Rendon and others
Defendant:
CSOS, LLC and KLX Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miguel Ramirez-Hernandez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 15-60186
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ and DELFINA MARGARITA RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Angeles Ramirez
as 14-41318
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGELES RAMIREZ
USA v. Angel Ramirez-Mora
as 14-40377
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANGEL RAMIREZ-MORA
Ramirez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00209
Defendant:
Albert Garcia and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diana McMahon, Roseanne Mills, Angel Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Ramirez-Ramos v. United States of America
as 7:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jesus Angel Ramirez-Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mendoza et al v. HoHoHo Express, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Mendoza , Angel Ramirez , Clayton E Holmes and others
Defendant:
HoHoHo Express, Inc. and Eric Ho
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castiblanco, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2012cv00473
Plaintiff:
Angelica Castiblanco and Angel Ramirez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Security National Mortgage Company and Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ramirez v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2011cv00533
Defendant:
Jesus Ramirez, Oscar Robles and The County of El Paso, Texas
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
