Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Argonaut Insurance Company v. GCBF, Ltd. et al
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Argonaut Insurance Company
Defendant:
GCBF, Ltd. dba Earth Tech, Saterra, LLC, GCBF 1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Faulkner v. Fulbright
as 22-20431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Faulkner
Defendant / Appellee:
Detention Officer Fulbright, Detention Officer Baines and Detention Officer Holloway
Denby v. Garcia
as 22-40189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Garcia, Senior Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit, FNU Delapp, Associate Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit, FNU Lane, Assistant Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit and others
Denby v. Collier - TDCJ Director et al
as 6:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp, FNU Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denby v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director, FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denby v. Garcia et al
as 6:2021cv01315
Plaintiff:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant:
FNU Garcia, FNU Delapp, FNU Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stasney v. Collier et al
as 6:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Stasney
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown Lane, Unknown McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Collier et al
as 6:2021cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jedidiah O Hopkins
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Unknown Lane, Unknown McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
