Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Chevalier v. Taylor Drug Store et al
as 6:2021cv03286
Plaintiff:
Curley Chevalier
Defendant:
Owner Teche Drug Store, Jace Quebedeaux, Owner Taylor Drug Store and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Collier
as 6:2021cv00348
Petitioner:
Alton Curley Adams
Defendant:
Laura Haney and Bobby Lumpkin
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00763
Petitioner:
Alton Curley Adams
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2021cv00379
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Curley Gene Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Land et al
as 2:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Land and Germaine B Curley
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 lc
Moore v. LaSalle Manage
as 20-30739
Defendant / Appellee:
Reginald Curley, Incorrectly named as Reginald Curly, Chase Wells, Ray Hanson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tiffany Robinson, Erie Moore, Jr. and Tamara Green
Devabhaktuni v. Trumph et al
as 3:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Andrew Messer, Talley Ray Parker, Barbara MG Lynn and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Curley v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14305
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. f/k/a Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories Ltd., Actavis LLC f/k/a Actavis Inc., Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Curley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duong et al v. Greyhound Lines Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01234
Plaintiff:
Curley Phan and Billy Duong
Defendant:
William Green and Greyhound Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terral et al v. Curley et al
as 5:2019cv00334
Plaintiff:
Matthew Terral and Charmaine Terral
Defendant:
United Financial Casualty Company, Charlie Tango Transport, LLC and Corey M. Curley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
