Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Jones v. Taylor et al
as 3:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Jr
Defendant:
R H Taylor, Jonathan Brewer, LA Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Deville
as 2:2013cv06669
Plaintiff:
Charles N Jones
Defendant:
Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Iberia Parish Workforce et al
as 6:2013cv02937
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Iberia Parish Workforce and Frank Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv03238
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02818
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Charles Jone
as 13-10735
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Charles Jones v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-50715
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES R JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 5:2011cv00772
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Charles P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
