Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Rowell vs Stewart Et Al
as 7:2017cv00139
Defendant:
Christopher Davis, Timothy Mason, Pat Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
LaSonja Brown and Nakeshilin Warren
Defendant:
Police Department, Christopher Davis, Detective Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. Davis
as 3:2016cv01974
Plaintiff:
Nakeshilin Warren
Defendant:
Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al
as 3:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Christopher Davis and Totina Davis
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association , Dallas County Texas and City of Dallas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera v. Livingston et al
as 3:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Hector Rivera
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Eligio Garcia and Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Livingston et al
as 3:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
Hector Rivera
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Eligio Garcia and Christopher Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Cunningham et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
Chandra Cunningham , Michael McCranney , Chandra Magee and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00566
Plaintiff:
Chandra Cunningham , All Plaintiffs , Michael McCranney and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
