Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Hawsey v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05217
Plaintiff:
James Hawsey
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worky v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05215
Plaintiff:
Bradley Worky
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05219
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitre v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
Corey Pitre
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Plaintiff:
Arizona Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, John Does, Phil Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St Martinville et al v. McKinsey & Co Inc
as 6:2021cv03832
Plaintiff:
Coushatta Indian Tribe of Louisiana, Phillip Terrell, Police Jury Rapides Parish and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cheatwood v. Zacharie et al
as 6:2021cv00550
Defendant:
City of St Martinville and Cavan Zacharie
Plaintiff:
Jacob Cheatwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wilson v Guidry et al
as 6:2020cv01335
Defendant:
City of St. Martinville, Chase Guidry and City of St Martinville
Plaintiff:
Brandie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
