Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Jordan v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Janet E. Jordan
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee et al
as 4:2016cv00862
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Jordan
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U S A) v. Jordan et al
as 5:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U S A)
Defendant:
Pamela E. Jordan and Sonia M. Semanaz Almendro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Jordan v. Roy et al
as 2:2013cv00421
Petitioner:
Kent E Jordan
Respondent:
Keith Roy, Eric Holder and Kenneth Magidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. ATI Career Training Center
as 3:2013cv04176
Plaintiff:
Benjamin E Jordan
Defendant:
ATI Career Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Chaney et al
as 3:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Williams
Defendant:
Brenda A Chaney, Cynthia E. Jordan and Katherine R. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Chaney et al
as 4:2011cv02751
Plaintiff:
Sidney Ray Williams
Defendant:
Brenda A Chaney, Cynthia E. Jordan and Katherine R. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trinity USA Operating, LLC v. Barker et al
as 4:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Trinity USA Operating, LLC
Defendant:
Vickie Bingham, Betty Sue Graham Bunn, Beverly Calandro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jordan v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01521
Petitioner:
Benjamin E Jordan
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Big Lots Stores Inc
as 2:2009cv05193
Plaintiff:
John E. Jordan, John E. Jordan and John E. Jordan
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
