Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Lang v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00521
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP), Warden M. Carr, Ms. FNU Dinkins and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balderas v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00496
Defendant:
Dr. Langham, Lt. Butler, FNU Cole-Rowls and others
Plaintiff:
Dominga Balderas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Griffis et al
as 7:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Chief Deputy FNU Mancha, Sheriff Mike Griffis, Lt. Jesse Abalos and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyce Cook v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 20-10587
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORES, Correctional Officer, BLACKWELL, Regional Director, JOHN DOE, Kitchen Personnel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REYCE JANON COOK
Garrison v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2018cv00330
Respondent:
FNU Raines, FNU Gonzales and FNU Lytle
Petitioner:
William S Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olivares v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Gonzales, L Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Olivares Rudy and Rudy Olivares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyrian Strong v. J. Grimes, et al
as 17-51134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DYRIAN K. STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN J. GRIMES, UNIT MAJOR KIMBERLY GARZA, CAPTAIN FNU VELLA and others
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michel v. Chapa et al
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Adelson Michel
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa, Radick Davis, Kim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Howard County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wooten
Defendant:
Howard County Jail, 118th District Court, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
