Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Lone Star Technological Innovations, LLC v. NEC Corporation
as 6:2017cv00687
Plaintiff:
Lone Star Technological Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
NEC Corporation
Not Yet Classified:
Harry Lee Gillam
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Harry Richardson v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 17-30575
Petitioner - Appellant:
HARRY LEE RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Boudreaux v. U S Framing Inc
as 6:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boudreaux
Defendant:
U S Framing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 2:2016cv15818
Plaintiff:
Barron Johnson
Defendant:
Harry Lee, Newell Normand, Ruth Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 3:2016cv00665
Defendant:
Ruth Jackson, Harry Lee, Newell Normand and others
Plaintiff:
Barron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 2:2016cv14769
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Harry Lee, Newell Normand, Ruth Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lee et al
as 3:2016cv00557
Defendant:
Ruth Jackson, Jefferson Parish Sherriff Office, Bobby Jindal and others
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2016cv13032
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Louisiana State, 24th JDC House, King Hammer Kat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of LA et al
as 3:2016cv00465
Defendant:
24th Judicial Court House Across Seas, DPSC, JPSO Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Jindal et al
as 2:2016cv02385
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal, State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety and Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
