Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Ward v. Hunnicutt et al
as 2:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
Gregory James Ward
Defendant:
Philip Jack Hunnicutt, C & C Land Services, LLC and Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mosby et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv03972
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mosby and James Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv04067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mosby and James Ward
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisions, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birdwell, Jr. et al v. XTO Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01564
Plaintiff:
Harold D Birdwell, Jr., Gerald Blankenship, Doris Vance Bowers and others
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc. and T.S. Dudley Land Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Case, et al
as 08-60405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY CASE, KEVIN CLARK, MIKE FULTON and others
Ward v. Unitrin Preferred Insurance Company
as 2:2008cv02888
Plaintiff:
James Ward
Defendant:
Unitrin Preferred Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ward v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 2:2008cv01708
Plaintiff:
James Ward
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hays et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sharlot Hays, Edwin Pearce, Brenda Pittman and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hays et al v. Merck & Company, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sharlot Hays, Edwin Pearce, Bulah Shaw and others
Petitioner:
Brenda Pittman
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc., Merck & Company, Inc. and Merck & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
