Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neely v. Flores et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Judy Neely
Defendant:
Jose Flores and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
USA v. Flores-Ibarra
as 22-50300
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Cesar Flores-Ibarra, also known as Jose Ibarra Flores, also known as Jose Cesar Ibarra-Flores, also known as Jose Flores, also known as Jose Ibarra, also known as Jose Ybarra, also known as Daniel Guerardo Ponce Torres, also known as Jose Cesar
USA v. Flores-Ibarra
as 22-50291
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Cesar Flores-Ibarra, also known as Daniel Gerardo Ponce-Torres, also known as Jose Ibarra Flores, also known as Jose Cesar Ibarra-Flores, also known as Jose Flores, also known as Jose Ibarra, also known as Jose Ybarra, also known as Jose Cesar F
Flores v. FS Blinds
as 22-20095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Flores, Jean Romero-Rodriguez and Brandon Villarreal
Defendant / Appellee:
FS Blinds, L.L.C.
Flores v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2021cv04218
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds, Alacrity Adjusting Solutions, LLC and David M. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 21-50855
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Flores Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2020cv01298
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
