Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Carranza et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Carranza and Juan F. Martinez
Defendant:
Crystal M. Smith and Secura Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. Dallas Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv01870
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Martinez
Defendant:
Dallas Police Department, Officer R Kahn, Officer John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bustos et al v. Invierte En Texas, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02690
Plaintiff:
CESAR BUSTOS and ADVANCE INVESTMENT LATAM LLC
Defendant:
INVIERTE EN TEXAS, LLC, KARINA HERNANDEZ, INVEST AND MIGRATE TO USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Martinez Morales v. Lumpkin
as 22-40282
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Alberto Martinez Morales
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Crosswell et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 4:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Jorge Crosswell, Gloria Wang, LA Trade Supplies, LLC and others
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Martinez Cecias Rodriguez, Karina Hernandez, Cecilia Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2021cv03951
Plaintiff:
Juan Luis Martinez Flores
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Garland
as 21-60819
Petitioner:
Juan Jose Martinez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
