Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Jackson v. Bank of America, National Association
as 3:2015cv00346
Defendant:
Bank of America, N. A.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jackson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02928
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson and Rhonda Jackson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Stewart et al
as 3:2013cv00496
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J. Stewart and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Allen et al v. Gulfstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03599
Plaintiff:
Daisha Allen , Kenneth Carter , Elizabeth Alphonso and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Jackson v. United States Of America
as 1:2010cv00737
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Hadley Auto Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv09470
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Hadley Auto Transport, Inc., Dionne Marlene Taylor and Dionne Marlene Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00534
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 6:2007cv00524
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-ID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00192
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
