Cases 11 - 20 of 1,164
Granados v. NCT Transport LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Israel Granados
Defendant:
NCT Transport LLC and Neal Trowbridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hargrave v. Moreno
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jim Hargrave, Jimmy Neal Hargrave and Jimmy Neal Younker
Defendant:
NFN Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littles et al v. GSC Wholesale, LLC
as 4:2024cv01767
Plaintiff:
Kegan Lee-Neal Littles, Tara L. Phillips and Terrell Sherman
Defendant:
GSC Wholesale, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harp v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Levi Harp
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verma et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv01158
Petitioner:
Neal Verma and Amitha Verma
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Neal v. UMB Bank, National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Cerissa R. Neal
Defendant:
UMB Bank, National Association, Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper, Fay Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Criswell et al v. Frost Bank
as 5:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Lanita Criswell and Lasheena Neal
Defendant:
Frost Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
Jeff Neal and Turn Key Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
