Cases 11 - 20 of 570
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 - Immigration and Nationality
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Ortega v. Singh et al
as 7:2024cv00259
Defendant:
Ahu Trans, Inc. and Manroop Singh
Plaintiff:
Abram Ortega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ortega v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2024cv00677
Defendant:
United States of America and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
Plaintiff:
EDGAR CARLOS ORTEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Ortega v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. CORNERSTONE AUTO PROTECTION INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
CORNERSTONE AUTO PROTECTION INC. and CALL HANDLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. Secure One Capital Corporation
as 5:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Secure One Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MAXI MARKETS LTD et al v. EU PAYMENTZ LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
MAXI MARKETS LTD, PROMETHEUS LTD and TLM LIMITED
Defendant:
Chris Ortega, EU PAYMENTZ LLC and Albert Christopher Ortega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ortega v. Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc.,
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ortega v. Fields et al
as 5:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Ortega
Defendant:
Daniel Gilbert Fields and Eric Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
