Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Steven Wilson v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-50825
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN PAUL WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Wilson v. Nix et al
as 3:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Paul Wilson
Defendant:
William E Nix, John C Forney, Robert G. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2014cv02817
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brown
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, R Darin Davis, Avoyelles Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00383
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Petitioner:
Steven Paul Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Stephens
as 1:2014cv00382
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Petitioner:
Steven Paul Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rojas v. Avoyelles Correctional Center et al
as 1:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jose Rojas
Defendant:
Avoyelles Correctional Center, Paul Wilson and B Dobbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Condara v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 4:2012cv02843
Plaintiff:
Janice Condara
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , Chase Home Finance, LLC , Long Beach Mortgage Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Parker v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2011cv01952
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lionel Parker
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Lynn Cooper, Clyde Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Wilson v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-60336
Petitioner:
PAUL ROBERTA CONSTAN WILSON, also known as Paul Wilson, also known as Paul R. Wilson
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wilson v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00457
Petitioner:
Jon Paul Wilson
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
