Cases 11 - 20 of 128
Villarreal v. Stiles Unit
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Juan A Villarreal
Defendant:
Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marino v. TDCJ Stiles Unit
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Achim J Marino
Defendant:
TDCJ Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Tapia et al
as 3:2022cv02769
Plaintiff:
Jordy Ramirez
Defendant:
Claudio Fuentes Tapia, Christopher Michalski, Ben Oz doing business as Prudential Van Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Calton v. Patel
as 22-40729
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Fitzgerald Calton
Defendant / Appellee:
Pinkie Patel, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Health Administrator, Stiles Unit, Dale Wainwright, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Chairman, Texas Board of Criminal Justice, FNU Eckersley, Individually and in his/her Official Capacity as Contract Dentist with UTMB/TDCJ and others
Duran v. Fisher et al
as 1:2022cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jose Duran
Defendant:
LaShawnda Fisher, Jacquelyn Womack, FNU Gooch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Robinson v. TDCJ Stiles Unit
as 4:2021cv02955
Plaintiff:
Elmer Ray Robinson
Defendant:
TDCJ Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiles v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2021cv01342
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
Kaye Chelette Stiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Vermilion Corp
as 6:2021cv01313
Plaintiff:
Vermilion Corp
Defendant:
Mark Stiles and Allen Ross Stiles
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
