Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Poke Loa - Harahan, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00208
Defendant:
Poke Loa Old Metairie, Poke Loa - Harahan, LLC, Poke Loa - Mandeville, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cintas Corporation, et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
as 5:2019cv01246
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2 and Cintas Corporation
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cintas Corporation No. 2 v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2019cv00881
Plaintiff:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Robert Young, Jr. v. Cintas Corporation Number Two
as 19-10757
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT YOUNG, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CINTAS CORPORATION NUMBER TWO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Louisiana Health Service et al
as 3:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company, Cintas Corporation Welfare Plan and Anthem Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Tracie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bullard v. Marker et al
as 1:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Pamela Bullard
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2, Inc. and Dayna Marker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Young v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
as 3:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Robert Young, Jr
Defendant:
Cintas Corporation No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
as 5:2017cv00896
Defendant:
CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chauvin v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 et al
as 3:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
Amy Ilena Chauvin
Defendant:
Cintas Corp. No. 81, Cintas Corporation No. 2, Cintas Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
