Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Michael Roberson v. Norris Jackson, et al
as 19-40355
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA A. URKUSKI, Sergeant, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH MEDICAL UNIT, AMY WESTBROOK, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CARDORA ROBERSON
Mott v. Edwars et al
as 6:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Austin Mott, Jr.
Defendant:
Jose G Mares, Duke G Mageto, Frederic M. Edwars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. Gore et al
as 3:2018cv00444
Defendant:
Officer Kimbrough, Cheryld Egan, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Coker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Henry, III v. XL Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv10287
Defendant:
XL Specialty Insurance Company, Corbin Jackson and Corbin D. Jackson
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL EDWARD HENRY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2018cv00548
Defendant:
Amy Westbrook, Sherry A Dickens, Norris D Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv03048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Moore v. Norris Jackson, et al
as 18-40756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
NORRIS D. JACKSON, Senior Warden of the Beto I Unit, BRYAN COLLIER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, JENNIFER COSTLOW, Registered Nurse - University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Kenneth Jackson v. USA
as 18-30916
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH D. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hasbell v. Jackson et al
as 6:2018cv00389
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hasbell, Jr
Defendant:
Dr Iboni Roland, Thomas Maciel, John Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
