Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Anson v. McClane et al
as 4:2019cv01123
Plaintiff:
James W Anson, II
Defendant:
Mrs. Hyde, Adam McClane, Amber Golsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fritz v. Mike Griffis Et Al
as 7:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Lt. Jesse Abalos, Yolanda Acosta, James McKinney and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Fritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ligons v. State of Texas-County of Harris
as 4:2018cv03550
Respondent:
State of Texas-County of Harris
Plaintiff:
David E. Ligons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starcher v. Wood et al
as 4:2018cv02361
Defendant:
Cara Wood, Jason Larman, Barbara Gladden Adamick and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eugene Starcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Ortiz v. Montgomery County, Texas, et al
as 18-20323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS, BRETT LIGON, PHIL GRANT and others
Vogel v. Montgomery County, et al
as 4:2018cv00856
Respondent:
Montgomery County , Brett Ligon, William Delmore and others
Petitioner:
George Vogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. Paxton et al
as 4:2017cv03156
Plaintiff:
George Wesley Martin and Megan Michelle Martin
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Brett Ligon, Rand Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Montgomery County, Texas et al
as 4:2016cv03357
Plaintiff:
Brian Ortiz
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Texas, Brett Ligon, Phil Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Jonescorp, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03535
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jonescorp, Inc., Isaac Jones and Ken Ligon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
