Cases 21 - 30 of 557
Stokey v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Bobby Neal Stokey
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, NewRez, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Neal v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
as 3:2023cv02530
Plaintiff:
Jack James Neal
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc doing business as Hobby Lobby, Thibodo Management Co Inc and GRT Properties I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Neal et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Torin Smith
Defendant:
Jeff Neal, Turn Key Medical, Bowie County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige v. Cooperstone et al
as 4:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
Ambreia Paige
Defendant:
Ryan Neal Cooperstone and Melissa Cooperstone
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Conroy v. Shell USA
as 3:2023cv01728
Plaintiff:
Neal Conroy
Defendant:
Shell USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Connall v. Basel, et al.
as 1:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Paul J Connall
Defendant:
Yvonne Basel, FNU Lewis and FNU Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dandona v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Neal Dandona
Defendant:
AIG Property Casulty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Counts v. Neal et al
as 6:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Randall Allan Counts
Defendant:
Barbra C Neal, Bobby Lumpkin, LaMorris Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
