Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02982
Plaintiff:
Eric P Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Bank of America
as 5:2012cv01117
Defendant:
Bank of America
Plaintiff:
John P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 5:2012cv00712
Defendant:
Micheal J. Adams, P.C. and American Express
Plaintiff:
John P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 4:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William P. Johnson and Suzanne J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Laird et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
Clyde Warren Laird , Bruce W. Alexander , Raffael R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Johnson v. FIA Card Services NA
as 5:2011cv00560
Defendant:
FIA Card Services NA
Plaintiff:
John P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Hull
as 5:2011cv00561
Defendant:
James N. Hull
Plaintiff:
John P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Powell et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04405
Plaintiff:
Virginia Powell , Andre T. Abram , Wyconda L. Abram and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Johnson v. Astrue
as 6:2010cv00095
Petitioner:
Cynthia P. Johnson
Respondent:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
