Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Anesha Coleman v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 19-11227
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY WAGENER, JR., Sr. United States Postal Service North Texas P&DC Installation Plant Manager, ALBERT RUIZ, United States Postal Service Spokesperson, GERALDINE FULTON, United States Postal Service North Texas P&DC Supervisor Tour 1 Payroll and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANESHA NICOLAY COLEMAN
Contreras v. Remco Insurance Agencies, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00164
Counter Plaintiff:
Remco Insurance Agencies, Inc. and Rahim Peerbhai
Plaintiff:
Ivette Contreras
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coleman v. United States Postmaster General et al
as 3:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Cindy Greg, Larry Wagener, Jr Sr, Brittany Lindsay and others
Plaintiff:
Anesha Nicolay Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
USA v. Rahim Williams
as 19-60277
Defendant / Appellant:
RAHIM WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morris v. East Mount Business, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv01187
Defendant:
East Mount Business, LLC and Rahim Momin
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morris
Naqvi v. Vanazara et al
as 4:2019cv01151
Defendant:
Navroz Qasim Ali, Sharif Rahim Ali, Zulfikar Vanazara and others
Plaintiff:
Faheem Raza Naqvi
Valenzuela v. Remco Insurance Agencies, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Remco Insurance Agencies, Inc. and Rahim Peerbhai
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hussein v. Savoy Plaza LLC
as 4:2018cv01008
Defendant:
Pervez Momin, Abdul J Ali, Wilcrest Property Partners LP and others
Plaintiff:
Rahim Hussein
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
USA v. Said Rahim
as 17-11349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAID AZZAM MOHAMAD RAHIM
Avila v. Raakeen, Inc. d/b/a Oaks Cleaners et al
as 4:2017cv03471
Plaintiff:
Maria Avila
Defendant:
Raakeen, Inc. d/b/a Oaks Cleaners and Rahim K. Maknojia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
