Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Revels v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv13414
Plaintiff:
Linwood Revels
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. f/k/a Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pherah, LLC v. Revel Systems, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00989
Plaintiff:
Pherah, LLC
Defendant:
Revel Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Revels v. Davis, Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv00490
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Revels, .
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Revels et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 2:2016cv08217
Plaintiff:
Lottie Revels and Lonnie Revels
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Norwood et al
as 7:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
John Henry Jackson
Defendant:
Tommy L Norwood, Joesph Eastridge, Richard Wathen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scanning Technologies Innovations, LLC v. Revel Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00492
Plaintiff:
Scanning Technologies Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Revel Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Revels v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv00215
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Revels, .
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Fernando Barraza-Revele
as 16-50242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FERNANDO BARRAZA-REVELES
Revels v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00746
Petitioner:
Kevin Lynn Revels
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duke v. Murray et al
as 5:2015cv02451
Plaintiff:
Linda Duke
Defendant:
Sharod T Murray , Red River Revel and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
