Cases 21 - 30 of 52
State of Louisiana v. DOE
as 22-60146
Petitioner:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy and Jennifer Granholm, Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy
State of Texas et al v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, United States of America, U.S. Department of State and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jesus, Rosa, Timoteo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 21-30734
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BST Holdings, L.L.C. v. OSHA
as 21-60845
Petitioner:
BST Holdings, L.L.C., RV Trosclair, L.L.C., Trosclair Airline, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Bentkey Services, L.L.C., doing business as The Daily Wire, New Civil Liberties Alliance and American Medical Association
USA v. State of Texas
as 21-50949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley and Mistie Sharp
Amicus Curiae:
State of Indiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Not Classified By Court:
Constitutional Accountability Center, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 21-40680
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Elizabeth Diaz, Jose Magana-Salgado, Karina Ruiz De Diaz and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
as 21-50792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
