Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Knight v. Walker et al
as 5:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Knight
Defendant:
Dianne Walker, Gabriel Walker, Jarita Bivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Steven Arreola
as 17-50055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL ARREOLA, also known as Michael Steven Arreola
USA v. Stefano Vitale
as 17-20025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEFANO GUIDO VITALE, also known as Steven Michael Vincent Palizzi, also known as Steven Nakayama, also known as Steve
Guerra v. USA
as 6:2016cv00067
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Guerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Steven Backstrom v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-51212
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL BACKSTROM
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Steven Seibert
as 16-41151
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL SEIBERT
Steven Backstrom v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50866
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL BACKSTROM
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Backstrom v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00395
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Backstrom
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01778
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seys v. Doucet et al
as 3:2014cv02883
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Seys
Defendant:
Julie Doucet, Gary Fitzsimmons and Earnest B White, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
