Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Richardson v. Richardson et al
as 3:2017cv00937
Plaintiff:
Clifton James Richardson, Sr
Defendant:
Clifton James Richardson, Jr, Clifton James Richardson, III, Gwendolyn Ellington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salvation Army et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co et al
as 6:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
Salvation Army , Barry J Sallinger and Cypress Street Properties L L C
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co , Consolidated Companies Inc and Southern Pacific Motor Trucking Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. The Salvation Army
as 1:2015cv00864
Plaintiff:
Sandra Johnson
Defendant:
The Salvation Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Perry et al
as 5:2014cv00816
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff's Department, Alicia Carter, City of Memphis and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villareal v. The Salvation Army
as 1:2014cv00083
Defendant:
The Salvation Army
Plaintiff:
Maribel S. Villareal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Villareal v. The Salvation Army
as 2:2014cv00120
Defendant:
The Salvation Army
Plaintiff:
Maribel S. Villareal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Laflin v. Salvation Army
as 5:2013cv01125
Plaintiff:
Michael Laflin
Defendant:
Salvation Army
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
De La Garza v. VA Grant Per Diem et al
as 3:2013cv03303
Plaintiff:
Jose G De La Garza
Defendant:
VA Grant Per Diem and Salvation Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Brown et al
as 2:2012cv02440
Plaintiff:
Wayne Gordon
Defendant:
Alfred Brown, Tamaka Golden-Ross, Karen Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garry Hornsby v. Department of Veterans Affairs, et al
as 12-20247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRY L. HORNSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVATION ARMY, NEVILLE E. POTTINGER, JAMES EATON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
