Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 21-30734
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BST Holdings, L.L.C. v. OSHA
as 21-60845
Petitioner:
BST Holdings, L.L.C., RV Trosclair, L.L.C., Trosclair Airline, L.L.C. and others
Respondent:
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, Martin Walsh, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
Bentkey Services, L.L.C., doing business as The Daily Wire, New Civil Liberties Alliance and American Medical Association
USA v. State of Texas
as 21-50949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley and Mistie Sharp
Amicus Curiae:
State of Indiana, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Not Classified By Court:
Constitutional Accountability Center, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice and others
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson
as 21-50792
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Whole Woman's Health, on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, Alamo City Surgery Center, P.L.L.C., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Alamo Women's Reproductive Services, Brookside Women's Medical Center, P.A., on behalf of itself, its staff, physicians, nurses, and patients, doing business as Brookside Women's Health Center and Austin Women's Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Penny Clarkston, Mark Lee Dickson and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
State of Texas v. USA
as 21-40618
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Louisiana and Sheriff Brad Coe
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
FIEL Houston, Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 21-30505
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Michael Nedd, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Bureau of Land Management and others
State of Texas v. Biden
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
Louisiana et al v Biden et al
as 2:2021cv00778
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Jon Raby, Karen Mouritsen and others
Plaintiff:
State of Nebraska, State of Missouri, State of Arkansas and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cook Inletkeeper, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
