Cases 31 - 40 of 2,900
Arnett v. C&S Delivery Services LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01643
Defendant:
Larry Tyrone Fairell, II, Corona Threats and C&S Delivery Services LLC
Plaintiff:
Bryan Russell Arnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Frankenfield v. Galveston County et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Defendant:
Mark Stevens, FNU Finlaw, Reneca Hensen and others
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell et al v. New Punch Bowl Austin Domain, LLC., et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Defendant:
New Punch Bowl Austin Domain, LLC doing business as Punch Bowl Social, Ahlborn Kegel - und Bowlingbahnenbau GmbH, US Bowling Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Aracely Garcia, Chris Thompson and Carl Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Russell
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01425
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conness v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Matthew Russell Conness
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freeman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00507
Petitioner:
Russell Scott Freeman
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
