Cases 31 - 40 of 740
Bridges v. Vargas
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
Lynn Bridges
Defendant:
Roger R Vargas, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bridges v. Safeport Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04727
Plaintiff:
Juanita Bridges
Defendant:
Safeport Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Window World of Baton Rouge et al v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv01827
Defendant:
Window World of Baton Rouge and Anthony Pierce
Plaintiff:
Larry Bridges, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Burke v. Cardiff et al
as 4:2023cv02920
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Durelle Cardiff, Dr. James David, Judge Chad Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Bridges
as 9:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Derek Clinton Ward
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Xavier Bridges
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bridge v. Wopac Construction, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
David Bridge
Defendant:
Wopac Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nichols v. Austin Bridge & Road LP
as 3:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Anthony Nichols
Defendant:
AUSTIN BRIDGE & ROAD, LP and Austin Bridge & Road LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bridges et al v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kayla Bridges and Deja Terry
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
