Cases 31 - 40 of 293
USA v. Cadenas
as 23-50097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Rolando Cadenas, also known as Mario Alexander Calderon-Campos, also known as Mario Calderon-Campos
USA v. Cadenas
as 23-50094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Rolando Cadenas, also known as Mario Alexander Calderon-Campos, also known as Mario Calderon-Campos
USA v. Orozco-Calderon
as 23-50077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Armando Orozco-Calderon
Calderon v. Lumpkin
as 22-40817
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alexander Brandon Calderon
Respondent / Appellee:
Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Calderon v. Hutto
as 22-20582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Agustin Calderon
Defendant / Appellee:
Assistant Warden T. Hutto, Captain Austin, Jeffrey Richardson, Senior Warden and others
Calderon et al v. Cenlar FSB
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Jose Angel Calderon and Erika Elizabeth Ramirez
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Ayala-Calderon
as 22-40734
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edgar Ayala-Calderon
Calderon et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv03379
Plaintiff:
Marvin Calderon, Frieda Cavazos, Faridah Davis and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Calderon v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Agustin Calderon
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calderon v. Lumpkin et al
as 3:2022cv00270
Petitioner:
Agustin Calderon
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
