Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Rhine v. Deaton et al
as 3:2011cv00698
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jo Rhine
Defendant:
Carl Deaton, Yolanda Deaton, Kelly Swanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhine v. Deaton et al
as 4:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jo Rhine
Defendant:
Carl Deaton, Yolanda Deaton, Dean Swanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhine v. Deaton et al
as 3:2010cv02475
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jo Rhine
Defendant:
Carl Deaton, Yolanda Deaton, Dean Swanda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deaton v. UNUM Life Insurance Co
as 4:2010cv00667
Plaintiff:
Curtis Deaton
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Administrator of the Con-Way Inc. Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bass et al v. JP Morgan Securities Inc et al
as 3:2010cv01327
Plaintiff:
Richard D Bass , Fred R Deaton and Harry M Whittington
Defendant:
JP Morgan Securities Inc and JP Morgan Chase & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fails v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00218
Petitioner:
Janice Deaton Fails
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Montgomery v. Bataille et al
as 4:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Montgomery
Defendant:
Gretchen Bataille, John Barcelo, Chris Deaton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Deaton v. Texas Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv02099
Plaintiff:
David Ray Deaton
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections and Hutchins State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deaton v. Texas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2009cv00547
Plaintiff:
David Ray Deaton
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections and Hutchins State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deaton v. TDCJ, Director
as 4:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
David R Deaton
Defendant:
TDCJ, Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
