Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Trahan v. Moore et al
as 4:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Philip W Trahan
Defendant:
Benny A Moore and Dufour Petroleum Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Trahan v. Moore et al
as 6:2009cv01994
Plaintiff:
Philip W. Trahan
Defendant:
Benny A. Moore and Dufour Petroleum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dufour et al v. Dow Chemical Company
as 2:2009cv04887
Plaintiff:
Mark Dufour, Mark Dufour, Mark Dufour and others
Defendant:
Dow Chemical Company and Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brumfield v. Oubre et al
as 3:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Shedrick J. Brumfield
Defendant:
Chad Oubre, John Hughs and Unknown Dufour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arbour et al v. Recreation By Design L L C et al
as 2:2009cv03733
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Arbour, Charles E. Arbour, Charles E. Arbour and others
Defendant:
Recreation By Design L L C, Shaw Environmental Inc, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hunter v. Sterling et al
as 3:2008cv00835
Plaintiff:
Erin A Hunter
Defendant:
Harold Sterling, Joseph Dufour, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ashurst et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 2:2007cv05070
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ashurst, Melissa Ashurst, Julie A. Brown and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dufour v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana
as 1:2007cv00725
Plaintiff:
Laura Dufour
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Damm v. Cooper, et al
as 06-31247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY DAMM
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURIE DUFOUR, GARY GRIMILLION, DEBRA MITCHELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
