Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowell Green v. USA, et al
as 19-50549
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE ROBERT L. PITMAN, Western District of Texas, BRANTLEY STARR, KEN PAXTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Simms v. Preston E. Smith Medical Department
as 5:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Preston E. Smith Medical Department, Mrs. NFN Runge and Ms. NFN Morales
Plaintiff:
Amos Lott Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00485
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green
Defendant:
James E. Davis, Judge Jerry E. Smith, Judge Alan D. Albright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. TDCJ Preston E. Smith Unit
as 5:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Amas Lott Simms
Defendant:
TDCJ Preston E. Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms vs Preston E. Smith Unit
as 4:2019cv00010
Plaintiff:
Amos Lott Simms
Defendant:
Preston E. Smith Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. JR Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
JR Reynolds Tobacco Company, John Bel Edwards, Steve Scailise and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 9:2018cv00212
Defendant:
James E Smith, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Courtney Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Latroy James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. BP America Production Company
as 2:2018cv09491
Plaintiff:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and Michael E Smith
Defendant:
BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
