Cases 31 - 40 of 309
Brown v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv04281
Plaintiff:
Cedric Brown
Defendant:
Sherrif Ed Gonzalez, Inmate Bank and Sheriff Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Frank Baker
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Detention Officer Vickers and Detention Officer Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Supervisor Over the Medical Department et al
as 4:2023cv04058
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Supervisor Over the Medical Department, Supervisor Over the Dietary Department and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03965
Petitioner:
Andrea De La Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Capital One Auto Financing et al
as 4:2023cv03973
Plaintiff:
Ryon Dior Lee
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Financing, Dereyk Fields, Kenneth Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Madise v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv03777
Plaintiff:
Tron Madise
Defendant:
Harris County, Sheriff Ed Gonzalez, Charles Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Nations v. Ed Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03769
Petitioner:
Mark Nations
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Ed Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03718
Petitioner:
Delarick Evans
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
Ernest Charles Thompson
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Francina Carr and Rene Hinojosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03547
Petitioner:
J.B. Black
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
