Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Gulley v. W H C Maintenance Services Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01436
Defendant:
W H C Maintenance Services Inc, Red Johnson, Crain Brothers Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Gulley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gulley v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv01263
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gulley
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engram et al v. Hudgins et al
as 6:2011cv00486
Defendant:
George D. Hudgins, Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC , Jane/John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan H. Engram , Curtis Fancher , Curtis Fancher - IRA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Graham et al v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2011cv02705
Plaintiff:
Anthony R Archer, Charles Wesley Graham, Kevin Brown and others
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engram et al v. Hudgins et al
as 6:2011cv00023
Defendant:
George D. Hudgins , Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC , Jane/John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan H. Engram , Curtis Fancher , Curtis Fancher - IRA and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Gulley v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00358
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Gulley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gulley v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00715
Petitioner:
Arzell Gulley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Gulley v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00209
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Gulley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gulley v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv01823
Plaintiff:
Willie Gulley, Willie Gulley and Willie Gulley
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Gulley
as 06-41528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARZELL GULLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
