Cases 31 - 40 of 43
USA v. Roshay Hocker
as 14-50901
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSHAY LAVOY HOCKER, also known as Roshay L. Hocker
Brewer v. Lavoi Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv04918
Plaintiff:
Edward James Brewer
Defendant:
Lavoi Corporation, Bob Gansel, Nicholas Mulliez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDBOX LOGISTICS, LLC et al v. LAVOIE et al
as 4:2012cv03351
Plaintiff:
SANDBOX LOGISTICS, LLC and OREN MCCORMICK VENTURES, LLC
Defendant:
CLAUDE LAVOIE and TBM Sand & Storage Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Latson v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv00308
Petitioner:
Antwoine Lavoy Latson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Laque et al
as 6:2011cv01393
Plaintiff:
Davin Ryan Hanks
Defendant:
Freddie Laque, Johnathan Lavoi, Michael Comeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latson v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv02533
Petitioner:
Antwoine Lavoy Latson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the U.S., et al
as 11-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
USA v. Roshay Hocker
as 10-51078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSHAY LAVOY HOCKER, also known as Roshay L. Hocker
Clyde Simms v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-41163
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLYDE LAVOY SIMMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the US, et al
as 10-20558
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
